I think, as a writer who's written similar articles, I would tell you to be wary of someone trying to sell you something that's against the norm.  I won't pretend to know these guys, as I haven't done nearly as much research on the rookies this year as I normally do, but from everything I have seen and heard, Richardson's supposed to be the real deal.  Now…normally I can make an argument that situation and opportunity mean more than talent in fantasy, but I think Richardson wins that one as well.  I think this article is highly undervaluing Blount.  He's terrible in the passing game, which is why I imagine they went and got Martin, but he's just what a ground-attack coach is going to want…someone big, strong, and stupid who will just keep hurling themselves against the defense play after play.  Martin will see touches, but I don't think it will be enough to equal Richardson even if he does struggle a bit as the focal point (keep in mind, Cleveland still has an excellent Oline, and a complete lack of offense didn't stop Hillis from being the bee's knees)

All in all, it's very possible that Martin's numbers end up higher, but unlikely, and if so will be due to injury or due to a small handful of monstrous games, because unless there is an injury, he almost can't be consistent.  I never think it's a bad idea to add a talented rookie in the hopes of panning out, but I certainly wouldn't take Martin over Richardson…not even if Martin was the starter.