User | Post |
8:56 am November 4, 2012
| DGB
| | |
| Straight up G | posts 1709 | |
|
|
I have a start 2 QB dynasty league and could use help with my 2nd starter to go along with Vick. Here are the options:
- A Dalton vs DEN
- R Fitzpatrick @ Hou
- M Hasselbeck vs CHI
- R Wilson vs MIN
|
|
|
9:02 am November 4, 2012
| drmemory
| | just east of here… | |
| Straight up G | posts 2908 | |
|
|
eeeeewwwww …those are brutal
don't have time to research it now but off the top o' my head (where there's no hair) I think Dalton looks like the best bet; by the pt-spread, he & Wilson are a dead-heat but Seahawks have a ground game…
|
|
|
9:05 am November 4, 2012
| cbasstard
| | |
| H.S. Junior Varsity | posts 15 | |
|
|
9:10 am November 4, 2012
| DGB
| | |
| Straight up G | posts 1709 | |
|
|
Yeah, they're a pretty sorry group, but this league's scoring is a little wonky in that we get 0.5 points/completion and 20 yards/point to go along with 4 pt/td. So a guy like Hasselbeck has done well these past few weeks throwing check downs to CJ and TEs. Lots of completions and yards can score well so bad QBs are still useful as long as they don't throw 4 INTs.
Dalton is who I've got in there right now, helped by your vote. Fitz could score well playing catchup all day and throwing to FJax/Spiller. I'm not really feeling the Bears/Titans game and Chicago has been getting a ton of turnovers. I think that Wilson's got the most variability as a rook.
|
|
|
9:37 am November 4, 2012
| drmemory
| | just east of here… | |
| Straight up G | posts 2908 | |
|
|
can't predict garbage-time stats …anyways, I'd be damned reluctant to start any QB not named Rodgers, Brees or Brady vs Bears or Texans and even then I'd be examining my other options pretty closely..
Wilson can always brain-cramp as a rook, but I think it more important that they just might not need him to do much – all their pts could come from Lynch, Vikes rush-D is good but not necessarily that good
bottom line, Dalton's gonna hafta throw whether they're getting blown out or keeping it close n' Broncs aren't any kind of turnover machine like HOU or CHI
|
|
|